<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only you can save journalism. Only you.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/</link>
	<description>Debunking the news business one neighborhood at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Deseo</title>
		<link>http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Deseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/?p=101#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Update: The Apple iPad hit the streets &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/apple-sold-300000-ipads-on-day-one/?ref=technology&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;last week&lt;/a&gt;, and early reviews say it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/books/blog/2010/04/ipad_reviews_great_ereader_but.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;great for content consumers but not necessarily content producers&lt;/a&gt;.

However, it seems to me the popularity of social networks has turned more consumers into de facto producers. Even if they don&#039;t write original articles, &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/03/facebook_users_prefer_broadcas.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they curate others&#039; works&lt;/a&gt; via Facebook and Twitter. They create (or at least contribute) to comment streams. And &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/03/twitter_and_news_and_media_web.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they share photos and videos&lt;/a&gt;.

Will de facto producers buy into the iPad? Why not, given the device&#039;s extreme coolness factor. And it will certainly change &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/04/three-ipad-design-choices-that-will-influence-how-we-read-news-online/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the way news sites are designed&lt;/a&gt;.

But I still contend that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the iPad will NOT save the integrity of journalism&lt;/a&gt;. And the existence of de facto producers places this technology behind the curve in terms of content distribution and consumption. 

Of course, the iPad will still succeed as a consumer product. And publishers&#039; heads will remain planted firmly up their asses until they shake their infatuation with each new toy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: The Apple iPad hit the streets <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/apple-sold-300000-ipads-on-day-one/?ref=technology" rel="nofollow">last week</a>, and early reviews say it&#8217;s <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/books/blog/2010/04/ipad_reviews_great_ereader_but.html" rel="nofollow">great for content consumers but not necessarily content producers</a>.</p>
<p>However, it seems to me the popularity of social networks has turned more consumers into de facto producers. Even if they don&#8217;t write original articles, <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/03/facebook_users_prefer_broadcas.html" rel="nofollow">they curate others&#8217; works</a> via Facebook and Twitter. They create (or at least contribute) to comment streams. And <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/03/twitter_and_news_and_media_web.html" rel="nofollow">they share photos and videos</a>.</p>
<p>Will de facto producers buy into the iPad? Why not, given the device&#8217;s extreme coolness factor. And it will certainly change <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/04/three-ipad-design-choices-that-will-influence-how-we-read-news-online/" rel="nofollow">the way news sites are designed</a>.</p>
<p>But I still contend that <a href="http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/" rel="nofollow">the iPad will NOT save the integrity of journalism</a>. And the existence of de facto producers places this technology behind the curve in terms of content distribution and consumption. </p>
<p>Of course, the iPad will still succeed as a consumer product. And publishers&#8217; heads will remain planted firmly up their asses until they shake their infatuation with each new toy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laryssa</title>
		<link>http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/01/28/only-you-can-save-journalism-only-you/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Laryssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/?p=101#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I love this: &quot;Technology is not the game changer that marketing experts want journalists and consumers to believe it is.&quot; Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this: &#8220;Technology is not the game changer that marketing experts want journalists and consumers to believe it is.&#8221; Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
