I don’t care what the Pew people pollsters say about radio’s decline in the news ecosystem. I still think it’s a good way to reach underserved communities that live off the grid, as well as Silicon Valley techies sitting in slow California traffic. And that’s where guest blogger and fellow hyperlocalist Dan Hugo steps in.
When you think “hyperlocal” or “community journalism,” you probably think blogs, newspaper-style articles or some sort of written word — I did. Clearly this is not the only way to go, and in August 2009 my colleague Kevin Fox and I tried a new angle on hyperlocal media in a project called Radio Sunnyvale (Calif.).
It wasn’t “real” radio at first, though we did toss around the idea of somehow getting our content broadcast somewhere in the area. We started off on my couch with “The Dan and Kevin Show” and talked about simple things, including the warning horns on the Caltrain that would pass by during our podcast recordings. By October 2009, our programming had diversified with city-council candidate interviews, special segments, and a well-received interview with the city manager.
Because our programming was not bound by time slots, hard breaks, and FCC regulations, we would post our content as recorded, without looking for sound bites or removing what we felt might be boring. If someone had something to say, we would put it up. Bringing as many people as possible to the table was the general idea.
We were well received — one operator of low-power AM radio offered to take us from a podcast to an on-air broadcast — but we were not necessarily well timed. With the declining economy, even the most supportive of Sunnyvaleans were not able or interested in contributing cash to the cause. Real interest did not translate to financial support. Even with our negligible operating budget, there was a need to pay the founders so that they might continue to reside in the city of interest. Ultimately, this was our undoing.
A traditional advertiser-funded model might have worked in an established medium, but visionary funding is needed when trying something new. A reasonable economy may have made that more likely. Creating a nonprofit entity probably makes sense, and we seriously considered making a community advisory board to keep the effort community-driven, at least in part.
Radio-style programming in the hyperlocal space is an exciting opportunity despite the financial difficulties we encountered in our first go. A better business plan, segmented shows, and a solid user interface for our podcasts are things we would attack first if we had to do it again. Also, a better way to measure our audience size would have given us more momentum when approaching potential advertisers.
Enabling real voices and real discussions without editing is a powerful proposition that builds trust between the community and its media efforts, as well as between people within the community. The discussion can flow and it can reach people who want to participate. There is still much to be done. To be continued?
Photo courtesy of Flickr user Burnt Pixel.

As a publisher of some local UK sites, can you recommend any web technologies / platforms for web radio?
From guest blogger Dan Hugo via Twitter:
I see where you are going with this and I appreciate your effort in pointing me towards this piece. First, thank you for helping me understand that blogging is not limited to just text – I’ve been officially ’schooled.” Secondly, I must make a disclaimer that I am a techie that happens to be a co-founder of a startup which has developed a hyperlocal communication and information tool. Thus, any subject related to hyperlocal is of great interest to me, personally and professionally.
Not until 2 months ago, did it dawn on us that bloggers, specifically hyperlocal, could possibly benefit from our platform design. Until recently, it has been difficult for us to identify someone who could articulate the challenges and needs of this community, until I found your blog. Without giving away too much of our “secret sauce” away in a public forum, we simply give people the ability to develop, manage and broadcast content, audio or text, into very specific geographic locations. Ultimately, this content can be viewed by any person, geographically near the epicenter of the broadcast, using a mobile device or pc with an internet connection. Thus, a user, depending on their current location, can see completely different content because a 5 mile shift in their physical location could, in theory, produce different results.
So, based on your articles, what we are doing is potentially a viable solution because the technical and administrative issues are solved, content can be segmented and underserved communities can now find their voice in a exclusively hyperlocal communication and information channel. If anyone is willing to help us better understand the needs and how we can help, three little guys in Florida are willing to listen. You can find me on Linkedin and Facebook.
Interested hyperlocalists should contact Kyle directly. Don’t forget to let him know your consulting rates.