<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mean comments? Suck it up.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/04/22/mean-comments-suck-it-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/04/22/mean-comments-suck-it-up/</link>
	<description>Debunking the news business one neighborhood at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ned Berke</title>
		<link>http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/04/22/mean-comments-suck-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Berke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/?p=379#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Ooof, man, can they be nasty. I previously wrote solely for print publications. Once I started running my own local news site - well, I thought my skin was thick before. Now it&#039;s as thick as a rhino&#039;s. A rhino with armor made of other rhinos. 

When my site was small, it wasn&#039;t such a big deal. Now that my readership is in the tens of thousands, the tone of the comments is shifting. I make it a practice now to guide things along. I brush off criticism against me (though sometimes I shoot a barb back. Very immature), but the true test of being a good moderator is jumping on flame wars before they start and prodding them into more thoughtful discussion. A lot of times it requires playing devil&#039;s advocate - but overall I think it makes for a more welcoming experience and drives even more traffic.

I just gave a quick look at the comments on her Salon article. I didn&#039;t go through every one, but it appears she never tried to jump into the conversation. I think this is a big problem journalists have - they don&#039;t realize that writing for online isn&#039;t &quot;just like writing for print.&quot; There&#039;s a level of interactivity, and the wisest way for them to tell the story is to be involved with the discussion afterwards. Usually when people see you&#039;re paying attention, they&#039;re more respectful.

My two shekels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooof, man, can they be nasty. I previously wrote solely for print publications. Once I started running my own local news site &#8211; well, I thought my skin was thick before. Now it&#8217;s as thick as a rhino&#8217;s. A rhino with armor made of other rhinos. </p>
<p>When my site was small, it wasn&#8217;t such a big deal. Now that my readership is in the tens of thousands, the tone of the comments is shifting. I make it a practice now to guide things along. I brush off criticism against me (though sometimes I shoot a barb back. Very immature), but the true test of being a good moderator is jumping on flame wars before they start and prodding them into more thoughtful discussion. A lot of times it requires playing devil&#8217;s advocate &#8211; but overall I think it makes for a more welcoming experience and drives even more traffic.</p>
<p>I just gave a quick look at the comments on her Salon article. I didn&#8217;t go through every one, but it appears she never tried to jump into the conversation. I think this is a big problem journalists have &#8211; they don&#8217;t realize that writing for online isn&#8217;t &#8220;just like writing for print.&#8221; There&#8217;s a level of interactivity, and the wisest way for them to tell the story is to be involved with the discussion afterwards. Usually when people see you&#8217;re paying attention, they&#8217;re more respectful.</p>
<p>My two shekels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

